Metadata Marketing: Risks and Opportunities
![]() Browse the entire HBR List. Listen to the podcast. Take the poll. |
To explain: Both user-generated digital content (an appointment made on a BlackBerry, photos taken on a cell phone) and passively generated data (your Skype profile, your GPS coordinates as revealed by your mobile phone, your Google search history) leave real-time trails or logs. As more and more activities “go digital,” these data trails together chart patterns of user behavior.
In an increasingly connected future, the data trails from all these sources will create a massive universe of metadata. A new generation of devices will provide filters or lenses through which to view this universe. This technology will send constant signals that can be used in the aggregate. Even now in New York City, for example, taxis equipped with global positioning systems allow officials to study the migratory patterns of yellow cabs and come up with better ideas for traffic engineering. Alternatively, increasing amounts of data recorded from people wearing monitors for heart problems or diabetes can quickly reveal patterns of behavior among these populations in a way that long-term studies cannot, yielding a possible boon for the health care industry and insurance companies.
This is just the beginning. Soon it will be possible to view, sort, and mine these aggregations in new ways. For example, tools such as Google Earth, in combination with a cell phone that logs personal health parameters in real time, could allow an organization to, say, map levels of emotion in the population of certain city areas. If the Red Sox won a baseball game, data sent from a variety of tools could be accumulated to register tremendous excitement in the Fenway Park area of Boston. If you’re a marketer who can read the emotions of large numbers of people in a geographical area, you will know not only where to put your next electronic billboard, but also what it should display at the moment. Cheers restaurant, for example, might post an ad saying “Come celebrate!” or “Drown your sorrows.”
The ability to tap vast amounts of aggregated “people data” will have serious implications for behavior, ranging from the way individuals control their personal interactions and information to possible manipulation—for good or ill—by corporations and governments. All this raises fundamental questions about whom to trust with our data: Are you more comfortable backing up your digital life with your online provider or doing it off-line in your home? Which data set is more likely to be compromised?
Large organizations that have the ability to monitor aggregated data will have to resist the temptation to abuse it. Individuals and companies will need to find and walk a new line between serving customers and exploiting them, either way with pinpoint accuracy. In the brave new world of aggregated data, companies will need to monitor themselves as well.
Jan Chipchase is a human behavior researcher on the design team at Nokia. He is based in Tokyo.
Sign up for the Harvard Business Publishing Weekly Hotlist, a new weekly email roundup featuring the top highlights from HarvardBusiness.org.
- Comments (3)
- Join the Discussion
- More by This Author
- Email/Share

Comments
Today, most company are unsuccessful. Yet their environment is risky and vague. So, there is a bit data about environment. What are you strategies on behalf of the company? Where are you marketing performance? Net, individual customer or interrelations? For companies less knowledge and more performance not possible. The first, knowledge performance of marketing. Secondly, information quality is customer to company,finally, well-designed marketing archtecture. Sincerely.
- Posted by Hüseyin YILMAZ
February 11, 2008 8:07 AM
Dear Jan,
I agree useful meta-data is a fantastic and emerging asset. Of course, some of the most profitable businesses of the past, such as TV Guide and Yellow Pages in the 1970s and 1980s were spectacular companies with wonderfully rich gross margins -- were meta-data firms of their day.
You mention location as a big variable -- and I think it is. But, I think the other user generated variables -- like what people are looking at (e.g. like Technorati, and the Broadcast feature in Facebook), and opinions/reputation -- like on eBay and Amazon, are more compelling meta-data, and are already having great sway. Social meta data is more socially interesting...
john
- Posted by John Sviokla
February 11, 2008 11:01 AM
Really informative and awesome
- Posted by Khawaja Anas Iqbal
February 23, 2008 2:41 PM